INDUSTRIAL RELIABILITY & MAINTENANCE

Downtime is not inevitable.

Aurelia keeps critical equipment running through condition-based monitoring, planned maintenance programs, and rapid-response repair — the same reliability engineering principles used across energy, aerospace, and heavy manufacturing, applied to your plant floor.

VIBRATION SIGNATURE — PUMP 04LIVE
R13.7B

lost to unplanned downtime every week across U.S. manufacturing (≈$852M) — Fluke Reliability, 2025

BY THE NUMBERS

The cost of not knowing

Most plants still find out about a failure after it happens. Here is what that costs.

R13.7B

lost weekly to unplanned downtime across U.S. manufacturers (≈$852M).

Fluke Reliability, 2025 ↗
R27.4M

average cost of a single hour of unplanned downtime (≈$1.7M).

Fluke Reliability, 2025 ↗
61%

of manufacturers had at least one unplanned outage in the past year.

Fluke Reliability, 2025 ↗
12%

of manufacturers have fully adopted predictive maintenance — most plants are still flying blind.

Fluke Reliability, 2025 ↗

Nearly half of manufacturers report outages lasting up to 12 hours, and 15% endure incidents that stretch past 72 hours. Reactive repairs also routinely cost more than the same job done on a planned schedule, once secondary damage, expedited parts, and lost production are counted — the case for shifting spend upstream, from repair to reliability.

Rand figures converted from the original USD study at ≈R16.13/$1 (September 2026) for reference — the underlying study covers U.S. manufacturers.

STRATEGY COMPARISON

Three ways to maintain an asset

Every piece of equipment gets one of three treatments. The right one depends on what failure actually costs you.

Reactive Maintenance

Run to failure. Repairs happen only after the asset breaks down or stops performing — maximizing short-term use, at the cost of unplanned, disruptive downtime and higher repair costs from secondary damage.

  • TimingAfter failure, unscheduled
  • Cost profileHighest per-incident cost; secondary damage is common
  • DowntimeUnplanned and disruptive to production
  • Best fitLow-criticality, cheap-to-replace assets
Cumulative cost Unplanned downtime risk

MEASURE WHAT MATTERS

Calculate your OEE

Overall Equipment Effectiveness combines three losses into one number. Move the sliders to match your line.

Availability90%
Performance95%
Quality99%

OEE = Availability × Performance × Quality

85%
World class. At or above the 85% benchmark used across discrete manufacturing.
WORLD-CLASS BENCHMARK: 85%  ·  TYPICAL PLANT AVERAGE: ~60%

CAPABILITIES

What we maintain, and how

A strategy assigned per asset, not a blanket schedule applied to everything on the floor.

CAP / 01

Preventive Programs

Scheduled inspection, lubrication, calibration, and parts replacement built around manufacturer specs and real duty cycles — not guesswork.

CAP / 02

Predictive & Condition Monitoring

Vibration analysis, infrared thermography, oil analysis, and ultrasonic testing to catch degradation before it becomes a failure.

CAP / 03

Reliability-Centered Maintenance

Failure-mode analysis that matches maintenance strategy to actual criticality and risk, asset by asset, not a single policy plant-wide.

CAP / 04

Emergency Response

Rapid-dispatch repair crews for the failures that happen anyway, with parts logistics built to minimize time to restart.

CAP / 05

Asset Lifecycle Management

Run, repair, or replace decisions backed by MTBF, MTTR, and total cost-of-ownership data instead of instinct.

CAP / 06

Compliance & Documentation

Inspection records, calibration certificates, and audit-ready maintenance logs, always current.

HOW WE WORK

Our process

The same four stages, repeated as a loop rather than a one-time project.

01

Assess

Baseline audit of asset criticality, failure history, and current maintenance state.

02

Plan

A strategy assigned per asset — reactive, preventive, or predictive — based on risk and cost.

03

Execute

Scheduled work orders, technician dispatch, and parts logistics, tracked to completion.

04

Monitor

Sensor data and inspection results feed back into the plan, continuously.

REFERENCE

The language of reliability

The five terms that come up in every maintenance conversation — and how they're actually calculated.

MTBFMean Time Between Failures
Total operating time ÷ Number of failures

Higher is better. Used to judge how reliable a repairable asset is over time.

MTTRMean Time To Repair
Total repair time ÷ Number of repairs

Lower is better. Measures how fast a team gets a failed asset back in service.

OEEOverall Equipment Effectiveness
Availability × Performance × Quality

A single score for how much of an asset's full production potential is actually realized.

RCMReliability-Centered Maintenance
Failure mode → effect → strategy

A structured process for choosing the right maintenance strategy for each specific failure mode.

TPMTotal Productive Maintenance
Operator care + planned maintenance

A shop-floor philosophy where operators share responsibility for equipment condition, aiming at zero unplanned downtime.

CBMCondition-Based Maintenance
Trigger = measured degradation

The umbrella approach behind predictive maintenance: act on real sensor data, not a fixed calendar.

GET STARTED

Let's talk reliability.

Tell us what's running, and where it keeps failing. We'll start with an asset criticality review before recommending a single work order.

Request a Reliability Assessment

Response within one business day. No obligation.